Small layout success… (Another Hilton & Mears Duo)

I really enjoyed every part of the process of writing with James when we worked on the West Lebanon blog post together and we’ve been exchanging thoughts on cameo design. This post correlates that enjoyable exchange and I’m thrilled to hand things over to James to open this up properly.

The potential spatial compromise enforced by building a small layout can often make it feel cramped, overcrowded and in fact emphasising its compact size. When I set out to build my own the aspiration has always been to instil both a sense of place and space…

James Hilton, March 4, 2021
James Hilton photo

Kinross is the latest chapter and follows a lineage stretching back to Creech Bottom, my first slice of Purbeck ball-clay narrow gauge, funnily enough in about the same space as Kinross takes up today. On the journey there have been successes and failures, learning from each in turn, what worked and as importantly what didn’t.

James Hilton, March 4, 2021

I remember thinking: “It’s incredible how big Kinross feels. How effective even subtle variations in the shape of the land all contribute to a feeling of open space”.

Kinross, Prince Edward Island in just 1000 millimetres… – James Hilton’s Kinross

This stopped me in my tracks, and made me think. I replied…

“I’m trying to work out why this is the case…I feel if between us we can distill the reason why a small layout can feel much larger, and explain it in an open, emotional yet descriptive manner we could help inspire and enthuse lots of armchair modellers”.

James Hilton, March 4, 2021

The railroad is created to move a thing from over here to over there. If it was close enough, within arm’s reach, we’d just shift it ourselves. As that distance increases we can’t help but notice the effort we invest in that motion. Sentenced to a purgatory in the local park the retired steam engine is sentenced to an identity crisis by being robbed of its most defining characteristic: motion. Those sights and sounds we associate with the engine are all signatures of life and a satisfaction of purpose and work. That experience is not static; it is the record of motion. Our train must travel distance. It must go somewhere. That somewhere is often too far away, in real life, and not far enough in our model railway system where there’s never that extra little bit we need. 

I wondered how I’d open my contribution but then, over first coffees this morning I realised this was the perfect place to paraphrase Doctor Who: “A journey through time and space”. If we think of the space of a layout as the walls of a box we can define the box by its dimensions and its contents; we could alter our relationship with the size of the box by concentrating on how we manipulate its contents to make it appear bigger on the inside. Scanning my library and looking for prototypes to base my model railways I’m met with so many good stories but all requiring more room than I have. Compressing them down into the space here has always been a feeling of coping with a minimum viable threshold for space. A dimension where, once you’ve compressed past it you’ve lost your connection to it. From the Central Western to Coy Paper, it’s fun to contemplate this conversation and I’m looking forward to seeing how we explore it.

One evening over the weekend, tucked up with the dog on the sofa in front of the fire I pondered this with a beer. I wondered if it was a possible to distill the subject down to a few principles? Could it be that simple? I figured that it didn’t really matter, and if all the principles did was guide a conversation then they would have served their purpose. So to that end here they are, fuelled by a heady mix of sleeping dog, Innis and Gun and the warmth of that open fire:

Suggested principles of small layout success: Deliberate scene composition, Consistent colour, both temperature and palette, Theatrical style viewing window.

James Hilton, March 4, 2021

Composition I guess is essentially about balance… but before considering that, it’s worth sharing the emotional driving force with Kinross – I wanted to create a feeling of open space that evoked memories exploring PEI with my Dad twenty years ago (long after the railway had been abandoned). This isn’t to say that emotion was more important than true prototype observation, rather the memories of an expansive landscape and wide open sky, the elements that set it aside in my memory from elsewhere in the Maritimes, should inform the layout more than prototypical scale dimension. 

James Hilton, March 4, 2021
Initial pen sketches in my notebook, thinking how the Cameo framed the view. – James Hilton

Considering this I had two original thoughts for a PEI cameo, both inspired by photographs… the first, Cardigan by Bill Linley, the second a black and white photo by Steve Hunter of Kinross. I sketched out both ideas… trying to use elements of the scenes to give a sense of place but also that sense of space. It’s interesting that by the time I visited the railway was long gone, I’m using my passion for trains, one shared with my Dad, to tread this path and informing it through photos that capture something in their frozen moment that feels worth modelling.

James Hilton, March 4, 2021

The available space was small, just over 3 feet long, less than a foot deep… (or about 1m x 25cm footprint, 20cm tall). How was creating this sense of space possible in such a compact area? I think this is what I mean about composition… It’s a trick taught to me by my Dad that photographers often use, one of splitting the view into thirds. Let me explain… If the whole thing space was left open if wouldn’t feel open, it would feel small, however by providing visual interest and vertical height at each end with open in the middle, your eyes glancing over the whole layout interpret the whole as one without scaling the length of each part…

Creating space isn’t about an empty layout, it’s about carefully controlled contrast. The whole layout gives a feeling of space, not the open space itself…

James Hilton, March 4, 2021

The speeding ticket reports kilometers per hour. In the model railway we can use a similar relationship between distance and time such that if we can’t alter one we can change the other. Instead of moving more quickly to cover more ground in less time, can we change how we consume time within a space that was previously considered too little? Often the answer to this question is met with a change in the complexity of a layout design and yields Timesaver switching puzzles based on a kind of checkers-like moderated complexity. If we just stretch a length of track across our four foot shelf our train reaches across this space pretty quickly. One length of track is too simple and the Timesaver too complex.

We all have our signature design elements – those things that no matter what model railway we are designing we include as our personal signatures. My ‘long sidings’ are probably my favourite signature element. On the Coy layout, my long siding serves the Coy’s mill. 

Comparing the long siding to the mainline there’s a proportion where the mainline actually only reaches across maybe a third of the scene. An engine leading a train into the scene never quite makes it to centre stage. It does arrive far enough into the scene to declare its presence and provide us with time to appreciate its self. Arriving from off-stage we heard the build up of its movement, closer and closer, toward us and now it’s here. Things like the middle of a place have an implied natural sense of purpose and balance and become like a destination. Not being there is not quite satisfying. That our engine creates such an opening act only to fall short of centre stage leaves an unease that we punctuate by transforming its first character of ‘engine leading train over distance’ to ‘engine doing something interesting within here’. I remember a time when I was delivering a presentation and lost my place. Breaking the unease of that awkward moment I probably did a couple of small actions to disrupt the pause before resuming my pace. Our engine does the same in a series of minor acts like uncoupling from its train and the few steps required to clear the headshunt’s turnout before reversing to off-stage and into the beginning of the main act. 

The use of staging behind a backdrop as a place where the train originates is so common today and it’s a powerful asset. Often in design our trains move fluidly in and out of staging and staging extends the length of the mainline run – but in doing so I think it can also undermine the separation between the reality contained within the backdrop’s envelope, our layout proper, and that hidden area, representing the away, a place we are trying to ignore if only to further the illusion that we occupy more than we have. 

Over the course of conversation I really enjoy seeing how we’ve developed two responses reacting to a common issue in design. I can see our individual personalities in our words but when I compare the designs I also see how the ideas we exchanged influenced the other’s work and it feels collaborative in an interesting way.

Composition of the physical view in our scenic area is important, but as is it’s relationship to operation. 

Considering both in an iterative nature will help the modeller instil that feeling of place, and space, in what is almost certainly a compressed impression of reality.

James Hilton, March 4, 2021

I think to continue this exploration into those three perspectives we opened with (“Deliberate scene composition, Consistent colour, both temperature and palette, Theatrical style viewing window.”) we thought it might be worthwhile getting this first one online as a place to attached subsequent conversation back to. I’m looking forward to seeing how we approach the next installments and excited to share them here. The subject of design in the context of model railways is a passion of mine and I think there’s a conversation greater than just track planning waiting to be had. What do you think? How would you approach this? What did we miss?

We’re posting this to both our blogs. You should check out what he’s up on his blog. He’s one heck of a modelmaker and does cool things you should see: https://paxton-road.blogspot.com.



Categories: hilton & mears duo, How I think

5 replies

  1. You two are a winning writing, thinking, illustrating, photographing, conceptualizing combination!
    Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
    Eric

    • Eric that’s very kind, it’s actually great fun and I really enjoy the creative process, I think we both do, however it’s ever better to read others enjoy the writing as well.

    • Thank you Eric! I love how the posts themselves develop during their writing. It’s like there’s an idea deep inside that needs to be expressed and interacting with it to find the right words to give it the agency it needs is enjoyable work. I love how it feels to read them over once they’re done to see what they’re saying.

      Chris

  2. James, looking at your sketches above for Cardigan and Kinross I’m reminded of your sketches for Claremont Paper and a conversation about changes in vertical distance over space. I have always avoided raising or lowering track – thinking that there wasn’t enough room to try this and the result being worth the effort but looking at your sketches I’m questioning my opinion.

    Breaching the sky delineates in a direct way the perimeter of the stage and shepherds our imagination away from the unspoken edge. We know it’s “away” because the train goes to it and away from our view. What if we used elements within the stage we are looking at to describe what happens off stage? A change in elevation could be a part of that story:

    If the layout has only one main track and one siding and that siding drops down in elevation from the mainline before it too disappears off-stage that ramp down could be part of the story of Away.

    Maybe the branchline we’re modelling is one we describe the path of using language like “meandering” or “rolling hills” but within a four foot shelf it’s hard to communicate that but if the mainline enters the scene and starts to drop down, even if only just the slightest amount, could that be enough to communicate a sense of rolling hills and a mainline that follows the land like we would exploring the same land on foot?

    Jack Hill’s latest update might be one other example of how we can look at changes in elevation within a space since the ability to change the vertical between a siding and a main track is such a critical part of his layout’s story – I’d wager at least as important as the train itself: https://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/42131

    Chris

Trackbacks

  1. Small Layout Success (Part Two)… – Prince Street

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: